Splinter group forms out of Canadian House of Commons

In the recent meeting of the Canadian House of Commons, one group has bitterly splintered off from the others.

Originally, a main bloc focusing on the economy, NAFTA, infrastructure and development and basic national needs decided to split into three groups. However, a fourth group emerged after some delegates disassociated themselves from the other groups.

According to NDP Courtenay-Alberni, the fourth group proposes an amendment which would allow them to regulate and uphold Canada’s high environmental status.

The elected representative of Avalon, a liberal, said, “We plan to advocate for the further research on the use of biomass of cows to improve dairy farming, plan for an integration system for refugees, and create new jobs for citizens”.

The splinter bloc, one of the many names referred to the divergent group, agreed to refer to itself as the Fair Unified Trade Unit Regarding Exchange, FUTURE.

“[FUTURE has] unique ideas that set us apart,” said Courtenay-Alberni, justifying their separation.

The members of the main bloc were not pleased. Numerous delegates of the “City Project/Smart/NAFTA plan” complained about the similarities between the two papers, questioning FUTURE’s decision to split.

“It was really a big surprise when the fourth bloc turned into a seceded state,” said a conservative delegate from Elain, Middlesex-London, “The fact that a group of ten people is attempting to write out solutions that are as detailed as those of twenty is laughaubly sad!”

The main bloc is still fighting to pass its resolutions in tandem and, though disgruntled by the discrepancies in the blocs, continues to push toward voting procedure.